Note: These posts were written during my early teaching years in a remote Australian school. They remain here as part of my professional archive: imperfect, reflective and rooted in a particular time and context. Some language and thinking has naturally developed since then, but the posts document an important stage in my growth as an educator.

There is a common expectation that teachers should know the students in their classroom. This means more than learning names, interests or academic levels. It also means understanding that students bring different experiences of culture, language, family, identity, community and access into the classroom each day.

These factors can be difficult to discuss because they sit within complex social and political spaces. However, it would be naive to pretend they do not influence educational outcomes. Teaching is not separate from questions of fairness, belonging and opportunity. In this sense, teaching is always connected to ethics.

In a remote community context, this becomes especially important. Research into the strengths and challenges experienced by Koori children highlights the need to understand wellbeing through context, rather than through a narrow or purely Western measure of school success¹. Students may arrive at school carrying barriers that are not immediately visible. Some may have had limited sleep, inconsistent access to food, family responsibilities, grief, interrupted schooling, or the daily experience of moving between different cultural and linguistic worlds.

Knowing the reality of where you teach is not an optional extra. It underpins the decisions made throughout the day. A student who appears disengaged may not need a sharper consequence first. They may need an adult who notices, listens and responds with dignity.

Demetriou describes empathy in schools as a two way process, grounded in effective relationships, mutual respect, genuine listening and unconditional positive regard². This does not mean lowering expectations. It means understanding students well enough to support them towards those expectations.

So what does all of this mean? Essentially, it means that effective teachers learn to see students as whole people. Each student brings a range of lived experiences that shape how they approach learning. Teachers need to be aware of these factors, plan with them in mind, and have the humility to recognise when they do not quite get it right.

To know a student is not only to know what they can do in a lesson. It is to understand something of the world they are walking in from.

—

References

¹Priest, N., Mackean, T., Davis, E., Waters, E., & Briggs, L. (2012). Strengths and challenges for koori kids: Harder for koori kids, koori kids doing well – exploring aboriginal perspectives on social determinants of aboriginal child health and wellbeing. Health Sociology Review, 21(2), 165-179. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.flinders.edu.au/10.5172/hesr.2012.21.2.165

²Demetriou, H. (2018). Empathy, emotion, and education. London: Macmillan Publishers.

AITSL Standards: 1.1, 1.3, 1.4